Scotched Justice

“Individuals can resist injustice, but only a community can do justice”
HomePortalFAQSearchMemberlistUsergroupsRegisterLog inScottish Newspapers


 Brian Kelly

Go down 

Number of posts : 399
Location : Glasgow
Registration date : 2008-09-03

Brian Kelly Empty
PostSubject: Brian Kelly   Brian Kelly EmptyThu Sep 04, 2008 6:41 pm

Brian Kelly
Date Referred to Court:
14 December 2000
Date of Conviction:
30 November 1989
Appeal Outcome:
Date of Appeal Outcome:
6 August 2004

More to be added
Back to top Go down
View user profile

Number of posts : 399
Location : Glasgow
Registration date : 2008-09-03

Brian Kelly Empty
PostSubject: DNA flaws set to clear officer jailed for rape   Brian Kelly EmptyTue Sep 30, 2008 5:11 pm

Published Date: 23 November 2003
A RAPE conviction against a former police officer is set to be quashed after it emerged crucial DNA evidence in the case was flawed, Scotland on Sunday can reveal.
Brian Kelly - who served four years in jail - has had his case referred to the Court of Appeal in a move that could lead to dozens of similar convictions for sexual assault being overturned.

Kelly was the first person in Scotland to be successfully prosecuted on the basis of DNA evidence and was jailed for six years in 1989.

But two separate studies have concluded that the way the first DNA test was carried out risked producing a ‘false positive’ result because a sample taken from Kelly may have got into a sample of the rapist’s semen found on the woman’s nightdress.

The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission (SCCRC) said Kelly’s case could open the door to further appeals by people convicted on the strength of the same DNA test, which was used until 1994.

Kelly’s lawyer, Campbell Normand, said: "Essentially what we are saying is that the expert evidence now available shows that testing procedures carried out on behalf of the Crown were such as to cast doubt on the results they produced in evidence at the original trial.

"That doubt was never put to the jury. It was put to the jury as a fact, which wasn’t actually supported by the scientific evidence. Cross contamination of the samples is the major issue."

The woman, a single mother, was raped at night in 1987 while she was in bed at her Ayrshire home by a man who got in through a window.

In July of that year Kelly, a traffic officer who lived in Largs at the time, agreed to give a sample of his hair and blood believing this would eliminate him from the inquiry.

But two-and-a-half years later he found himself convicted by a majority verdict of raping the woman, largely on the strength of the DNA test.

The decision came despite the fact the woman did not identify him as the rapist even though she knew him. Also on the night in question, Kelly had been out drinking, but the victim did not say her attacker smelled of alcohol.

In 1991 the first doubts began to surface about the accuracy of DNA tests and a study in the United States later found that errors were made in around one in 50 cases.

Two years later Kelly was a free man but his release on parole was delayed because he refused to admit his guilt. He moved to Kilmarnock where he has since worked in a pub and as a lorry driver.

In 1994, the concerns over the system of DNA testing resulted in a major overhaul of the way profiling was carried out.

Kelly continued to protest he was an innocent man and the case was referred to the SCCRC after an attempt to appeal failed to overturn his conviction.

The commission formally referred the case back to the High Court in December 2000 and a hearing is expected early next year.

Robin Johnston, the senior legal officer at the SCCRC who dealt with the case, said if Kelly’s conviction was overturned it could result in legal challenges from others jailed on the strength of DNA evidence before 1994.

"To my knowledge we’ve only referred one case to the High Court based on DNA issues and that’s Brian Kelly’s," he said.

"It could certainly lead to more cases depending on what the view of the High Court is. My understanding is it’s a matter of some controversy and you’re not going to find a uniform view from the scientists."

The decision to send the case back to the High Court was taken after the defence submitted a report by the US-based forensic scientist Dr Simon Ford, which highlighted the scientific concerns over the test.

The SCCRC then obtained a second opinion from world-famous expert Dr Adrian Linacre, of Strathclyde University.

He said there was a possibility that a sample of Kelly’s DNA was mixed with DNA taken from semen on the rape victim’s nightdress during the testing.

"When you look at the gel image in this case there’s a great big, very intense band from the blood sample from Kelly, but a very faint band from the nightdress," he said.

"The issue was whether you had a sample like this producing weak bands that obviously would match because of some of Kelly’s sample had got into the sample from the nightdress. Maybe that’s the reason why we have found bands on the crime scene samples but much brighter bands on Kelly’s sample."

Legal expert Professor Robert Black, of Edinburgh University, said that the ramifications of the Kelly case could be far-reaching.

"It is obviously important because DNA is regarded as crucial so if a doubt is going to be cast upon it, that’s a major, major thing," he said.

"It could mean that other people who were convicted under the old technique will raise this issue."

Leading QC Donald Findlay, who was previously involved in the case and believes it may well have been a miscarriage of justice, said: "I did feel very, very uneasy about it. The DNA was the problem.

"I defended a number of cases on the basis that you really couldn’t trust DNA testing because it was in its infancy.

"But it seems to be pretty impressive nowadays. I’ve had it checked in a number of cases independently and I have not come up with a case to say it’s wrong."
Back to top Go down
View user profile

Number of posts : 399
Location : Glasgow
Registration date : 2008-09-03

Brian Kelly Empty
PostSubject: 'Rape' officer clears his name   Brian Kelly EmptyTue Sep 30, 2008 5:12 pm

A former policeman has been cleared of rape after protesting his innocence for 15 years.

Judges at the Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh ruled that Brian Kelly, 47, had suffered a miscarriage of justice over crucial DNA evidence.

He was jailed for six years in 1989 after being found guilty of raping a woman acquaintance in Largs.

Appeal judges said new evidence had shown a risk of cross-contamination of samples used for genetic profiling.

His case was one of the first in Britain where the technique was used to secure a conviction.

Conviction quashed

The victim, who knew Mr Kelly well, did not identify him as her attacker.

The most important evidence for the prosecution at the trial was DNA material from stains found on the woman's dressing gown.

Three judges at the Court of Criminal Appeal in Edinburgh have now ruled that his conviction should be quashed.

The Lord Justice General, Lord Cullen, said new evidence showed that there was a risk of cross-contamination of samples in the procedures used for genetic profiling at the time.

He has established the existence of evidence which is of such significance that the fact that it was not heard by the jury constituted a miscarriage of justice
Lord Cullen
"DNA evidence was plainly of critical importance for the conviction of the appellant," he said.

"If the jury had rejected that evidence there would, in our view, have been insufficient evidence to convict the appellant.

"Accordingly, while the evidence related to a low risk of cross-contamination, the magnitude of the implications for the case against him were substantial.

"For these reasons we have come to the conclusion that he has established the existence of evidence which is of such significance that the fact that it was not heard by the jury constituted a miscarriage of justice."

Mr Kelly's case was sent back to the appeal court after being investigated by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission.

DNA testing

His counsel, Scott Brady QC, argued that there was significant additional evidence relating to cross-contamination of samples.

At the time, samples from the victim and the suspect were loaded into laboratory wells on either side of a well containing the crime scene sample.

It was claimed that there was a risk of the sample from the dressing gown stain becoming contaminated with the sample from the suspect.

The method of DNA testing was changed in 1990, with crime scene and reference samples no longer being placed next to each other.

An expert told the appeal judges that American laboratories had become aware of a danger of cross-contamination if there was not an empty well between samples.
Story from BBC NEWS:

Published: 2004/08/06 13:10:31 GMT
Back to top Go down
View user profile
Sponsored content

Brian Kelly Empty
PostSubject: Re: Brian Kelly   Brian Kelly Empty

Back to top Go down
Brian Kelly
Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Scotched Justice :: Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission. :: Succesful Cases Referred by the Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission-
Jump to: